In the last 25 years, India have won only four one-dayers in a bilateral series in South Africa.Now, the series in England will be different ball game.Fielding coach R. "Even the South Africans didn’t expect us to play him in the first Test.India won that match to pull one back as they went 1-2 down in the Test series but took the momentum into the limited overs series that followed. oh! The fast bowlers pitched in, which is what Virat wanted — in Test matches, the fast bowlers’ batting plays a vital role while their fielding is crucial in the one-dayers, he had said ahead of a practice session," the 47-year-old revealed. The Proteas just couldn’t pick them and resembled rabbits caught in headlights," the former Hyderabad left-arm spinner said. To do that on pitches that were good for fast bowling is heartening. I would say each 30 was an 80 on that difficult wicket which had cracks, bounce, was seaming. That works wonders for him. Steve Waugh said recently that Virat should tone it down, but I think that is his USP, to keep it right up there till the last ball. The Tigers have turned Springboks after the recent South Africa tour and found a new leap of faith. He was hitting him on the glove, getting him caught behind, getting him in the slips," Sridhar said. Bumrah fielded 89 balls in six one-dayers and didn’t fumble once — he didn’t concede one extra run. We need that Virat in-your-face factor," Sridhar said..’ That was 12 innings!""Bumrah also had Quinton’s (de Kock) number. "The main contributors in the field were the fast bowlers — Bumrah, Bhuvneshwar and Pandya. Generally, your fast bowlers are taking breaks at fine-leg or deep square leg."Bhuvi was the silent assassin.Surprise. We lost the two Tests but knew we were in positions to win both of them, so that belief never went down.Hyderabad: Thumping wins in the one-day and T20 contests which erupted from a brownie blow in the last round of the lost Test series have put a spring in Team India’s steps."Sridhar picked out a few players who were outstanding.

We are improving though. "Once we got ahead, South Africa were under severe pressure," Sridhar pointed out.However, there is a balance. The athleticism in the field was far, far better than the opposition, who are known for their athletic ability," he said. To win the toss and bat on that surface was a great decision, the game changer," he told this newspaper on Wednesday.Sridhar is also pleased with the team’s fielding.. His fielding workload was next only to Virat, who mans the high-traffic zones," Sridhar explained. And then, in the third Test at Johannesburg, Virat made a courageous decision to bat first — I don’t think anyone would’ve done that. They were planning for Bhuvi (seamer Bhuvneshwar Kumar), Shami and Ishant (Sharma). With the red one, slip catching is a challenge. After that there was no looking back for him. "Hardik Pandya is always thinking ahead of the game.Spin twins Kuldeep Yadav and Yuzvendra Chahal are next on Sridhar’s list. "The ball will wobble.. This time around, they bagged five out of six matches. The catch that Bhuvi took on the boundary to end Hashim Amla’s innings in the Johannesburg one-dayer was fabulous. We discovered we had won 9 out of the 21 sessions with South Africa winning 11 and the other being a draw. As both teams were mingling in the dressing room, Hashim (Amla) came up to him and said: ‘I waited for a half-volley for three Tests and six one-dayers but never got one. If his bowling fails, he’ll affect a match-turning run-out like he did thrice in the series. South Africa won just two of the nine games in the limited over series, both rain-affected. Overall I’m happy, especially with the white ball. Virat led the team from the front.

The advantage of Hardik is that he is three-dimensional — if he misses out on batting, he’ll bowl a brilliant spell. He’s a brilliant cricketer to have — what an athlete!"Pacer Jasprit Bumrah was a revelation, according to Sridhar. And the kind of innings he played in the Johannesburg Test where he scored 30 in each innings was simply superb... He is learning very, very fast China Machine for making spring Manufacturers from Virat, MS (Dhoni) and others around him. We’ve got more methods to train now and are making our practice sessions harder," Sridhar said. "We outfielded South Africa in the series, didn’t put a foot wrong barring a couple of dropped catches in one of the one-dayers. Since he’s got bowling and fielding to back him, he goes to bat with a lot of freedom, so also in the other two departments. "For every Virat we have an Ajinkya (Rahane) and a Cheteshwar Pujara who are quiet in their demeanour and complement the captain very well. Sridhar says it’s the belief that kept the Blues charged. the way Bumrah ran 30 metres to his right to take a tumbling catch at third man in the Centurion ODI and Pandya running out Amla in the game at Port Elizabeth was heartening. "After the second Test we did a lot of homework in the one week off we got."The physically as well as mentally gruelling series was all about Kohli’s batting and our bowling. The best compliment he got was at the end of the One-Day series. But all of a sudden there was Boom-rah and his first wicket was AB de Villiers, bowled. It is difficult for any international cricketer to match his intensity in the field.

Megosztás a facebookon

Stories in linenThinking out of the box yet again, Narendra Kumar showcased his new summer sportswear inspired collection —The Fake Show. Dusty aqua, sorbet pink, blue and neutral ivory fabrics were woven with intricate floral embroideries.Floral beautyLike the spring and summer blossoms that bloom in gardens, designers Vineet Kataria and Rahul Arya’s Bageecha for their label VineetRahul unleashed a colourful line of romantic floral designs. Adding a bit of a fusion touch to their designs, the lehengas, cholis and Spring forming machine Price kurtas had a western feel to them. Athleisure met hip-hop, in a collection that was dominated by Irish linen.A bride’s dreamAs is par for course, designer duo Shyamal and Bhumika brought to the ramp a dazzling array of beautiful bridal wear. When Tisca Chopra floated onto the ramp as showstopper, she looked every bit a fairytale princess in her bower, in a blush pink striped lehenga, a sequined blouse and floaty cape.The final day of Lakme Fashion Week 2018 saw designers make use of muted tones and lighter pastels, anticipating the grand finale with Anamika Khanna’s nudes reinvented theme.

Using bold reds and blacks, as well as stark whites, Narendra tried to portray the bizarre nature of the society, where free speech is just a means for faking it. On the other hand, the gowns had an Indian feel with their encrusted bodices, ruffled, flared skirts and flowing organza. The designing duo presented Wonderland, a luxury bridal collection that consisted a proffusion of sumptuous satin, appliquéd organza and ruffled hemlines. Rahul Khanna turned showstopper for the designer bringing the thought-provoking show to an apt end in his all-white outfit.. Gliding along the ramp in a dazzling ivory encrusted gown with a tulle veil, Bollywood Queen Kangana Ranaut brought the show to a glorious end.

Megosztás a facebookon

The previous round of policy-tightening came after more than 250 advertisers cut back on YouTube ad-buying last spring following news reports that found their ads displayed alongside extremist propaganda.Booting small channels from advertising eligibility will not fully address concerns raised by advertisers about videomakers going too far, YouTube acknowledged in the blog post.".Google is vowing to have people review every second of the most popular videos eligible for advertising by the end of March worldwide, and it is modifying the prerequisites for having a commercial channel.Alphabet Google is making its second attempt in less than a year to protect advertisers on its YouTube user channels from being associated with videos featuring violence, gore or bad language. YouTube executives said they would "schedule conversations with our creators in the months ahead" to see "what more we can do to tackle that challenge."

While we took several steps last year to protect advertisers from inappropriate content, we know we need to do more to ensure that their ads run alongside content that reflects their values," Paul Muret, Google vice president of display, video and analytics, wrote in a blog post on January 16. Celebrity video blogger Logan Paul has 15 million followers, but YouTube last week pared back Grinding machine Suppliers its commercial relationship with him after he drew public outrage for showing a suicide victim in a clip.Many brands returned within weeks or months, only to again suspend dealings with YouTube in the autumn because of headlines that linked them to videos in which children appeared endangered or popular cartoons that had been disturbingly altered. Mondelez International Inc, whose brands include Oreo cookies and Ritz crackers, and computer and printer maker HP Inc were among dropouts. The requirement introduced last April had been 10,000 followers with no viewing time standard. Under the new standards, Google will remove advertising from a "significant" number of YouTube channels, 99 percent of which generated less than $100 from ads in the last year, the company announced on January 16 in response to advertisers that felt they have been underwriting inappropriate material.The issues have not affected YouTube’s revenue, which represents a crucial growth area for Google, according to financial analysts. Starting February 20, videomakers will need to attract users watching a total of at least 4,000 hours of their clips within the preceding 12 months and notch 1,000 followers before being able to host ads and share in revenue from them.

Megosztás a facebookon

By definition, the term adultery covers any extramarital incidence of sexual intercourse.Adultery has existed from time immemorial, although there are enough stories to prove that the shame of stepping out has faded. The law gives no power to women to lodge cases against their husbands if they are in adulterous relationships. In its current form, only a married man can lodge a criminal case against the ‘other’ man with whom his wife is having an affair. The term of imprisonment for such a man is five years.  "My mom chose judicial separation to divorce for the same reason. However, society must realise that a woman is equal to a man in every way and hence this provision appears to be quite archaic. If we had an agency to express our will to separate and seek compensation with speedy settlement of maintenance in courts, I am sure women would take a stand," she says. The women herself is denied of any agency."Supreme Court of IndiaThe existing law on adultery has caused several issues due to the fact that the husband is never implicated for having an affair. The section holds that women are being treated as chattel and that adultery committed by a man with a married woman, with the consent of her husband, is not a crime.Change is in orderPrima facie, Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code grants relief to the wife by treating her as a victim. Presently, Section 497 is being viewed differently.

As things stand now, you are treating a woman as though she is a minor, not able to make her own choices. It is also worthy to note that when an offence is committed by both individuals, one is liable for criminal offence but the other is absolved. Even worse, patriarchal conditioning affects the next generation too.Keerthi Anantha, advocate, Tatva Legal, also points out that the laws, as they stand, reduce women to mere chattel in the marriage market."A change in the current laws would be most welcome. When the society progresses and rights are conferred, a new generation of thoughts spring forth, and hence, we are inclined to say that change is in order. My mother’s case dragged on for 17 years in the family court and I turned 29 by the time she was given Rs 1,500 a month as maintenance.With the Supreme Court deciding to re-examine a 150-year-old provision on adultery in the Indian Penal Code, which treats women only as victims and men as offenders, a new debate has opened up as to why women can’t be punished for adultery. Both men and women are equally responsible for adultery, and as such, should face equal consequences for their intercessions.Section 497 of the IPC, which deals with adultery, is being re-examined by the Supreme Court, while a debate rages about how much power and blame women should shoulder. Varsha Bhargavi, founder, Concept Voyages, recounts how it affected her own mother. Instead of looking at that aspect of things, the Supreme Court is focusing on how the extant laws are harmful for women. Cheating feels ‘normal’ — girls become more tolerant and boys think it is allowed. However, according to Section 497 of the Indian Constitution, a woman cannot be convicted for adultery.

The pact of convenient infidelity suits not just the husbands, but the ‘other’ women too. The Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality by stating that Article 14 allowed beneficial legislation and since it was beneficial to women, it was not violating Article 14. "The power is completely in the hands of the husband, as things stand.—With inputs from Dyuti Basu.Abha SinghAdvocate Abha Singh decries the fact that the Supreme Court is only looking at the fact that women are not punishable, without giving them the power to lodge cases as well. If the law is indeed amended, then both aspects should be addressed, not just the lack of punishment for women," she asserts. Social stigma associated with separation is always a burden a woman has to carry along CNC Spring machine Suppliers with the lack of social support from family or financial independence. This entire business simply shows the misogynistic mindset of the Supreme Court. She explains, "There was an earlier case where Section 497 was challenged, alleging that it violated Article 14 of the Constitution, since women were not punishable for adultery. She is not given the power to lodge an adultery case against her husband either. Be it Raj Kapoor, Rekha, Kamal Haasan or Sridevi, they all had alleged extramartial affairs but bounced back unscathed. The laws, as they stand now, are anything but equal," says divorce advocate Mridula Kadam. This has been interpreted as holding a woman in a bad light.

Megosztás a facebookon